Allah yeryï¿½zï¿½ndeki tï¿½m canlï¿½larï¿½ kusursuz sistemlerle yaratmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. Evrimciler ise birbirinden farklï¿½ mekanizmalara sahip olan bu tasarï¿½mlarï¿½n kï¿½kenini asla aï¿½ï¿½klayamamaktadï¿½r.

Evrimciler yeryï¿½zï¿½ndeki ilk canlï¿½nï¿½n nasï¿½l ortaya ï¿½ï¿½ktï¿½ï¿½ï¿½na aï¿½ï¿½klï¿½k getiremedikleri gibi aynï¿½ kï¿½kene sahip olduï¿½unu iddia ettikleri tï¿½m canlï¿½larï¿½n, birbirinden farklï¿½ sistemlere sahip olmalarï¿½ konusunda da bï¿½yï¿½k bir ï¿½aresizlik iï¿½indedirler. Konu hakkï¿½nda sadece yï¿½zeysel bir bilgiye sahip olan "amatï¿½r" evrimciler hariï¿½, evrimcilerin hemen hemen tamamï¿½ kendileri aï¿½ï¿½sï¿½ndan asï¿½l sorunun ï¿½ok iyi farkï¿½ndadï¿½rlar: Yeryï¿½zï¿½ndeki canlï¿½ tiplerinin, tï¿½rlerin ve tï¿½r zenginliï¿½inin kï¿½kenini aï¿½ï¿½klamak. Charles Darwin ve takipï¿½ilerinin asï¿½l aï¿½ï¿½klamalarï¿½ gereken konu iï¿½te budur. Darwin Tï¿½rlerin Kï¿½keni adlï¿½ kitabï¿½nda, konuya iliï¿½kin tek bir somut delil sunamamï¿½ï¿½, sadece spekï¿½lasyon yapmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. Charles Darwin, oï¿½lu Francis Darwin tarafï¿½ndan yayï¿½mlanan Charles Darwin'in Hayatï¿½ ve Mektuplarï¿½ adlï¿½ kitapta yer alan bir mektubunda, bu gerï¿½eï¿½i ï¿½ï¿½yle itiraf etmiï¿½tir:"Bir tï¿½rï¿½n diï¿½erine deï¿½iï¿½imine iliï¿½kin hiï¿½bir kayï¿½t yoktur... Tek bir tï¿½rï¿½n deï¿½iï¿½tiï¿½ini kanï¿½tlayamayï¿½z." (Francis Darwin, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Cilt.II, 1888, s. 210.)Darwin zaman iï¿½inde ve bilimsel araï¿½tï¿½rmalarï¿½n ilerlemesiyle, sï¿½z konusu sorunun yanï¿½tlarï¿½nï¿½n bulunacaï¿½ï¿½nï¿½, tï¿½r oluï¿½umunun delillendirileceï¿½ini umuyordu. Ama aksine, bilimsel bulgular her defasï¿½nda Darwin'i yalanladï¿½.

Amerikan Doï¿½a Tarihi Mï¿½zesi'nden Profesï¿½r Gareth Nelson konuyu ï¿½u ifadelerle anlatï¿½r: "Tï¿½r problemi yï¿½llardï¿½r devam etmekte ve tï¿½rleï¿½me her zaman olduï¿½u gibi bir kara kutu olarak kalmaktadï¿½r." (G. Nelson, ï¿½Species and Taxa: Systematics and Evolutionï¿½, s. 73-74)
Aslï¿½nda bu konunun "bir kara kutu olarak" kalmasï¿½ ï¿½aï¿½ï¿½rtï¿½cï¿½ deï¿½ildir. Zira bilimsel bulgular, bir tï¿½rden baï¿½ka bir tï¿½re dï¿½nï¿½ï¿½ï¿½mï¿½n mï¿½mkï¿½n olmadï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½, deï¿½iï¿½imin sadece tï¿½r iï¿½inde ve belirli sï¿½nï¿½rlar dahilinde gerï¿½ekleï¿½tiï¿½ini ortaya koymuï¿½tur. Konuyu daha iyi anlamak iï¿½in basit bir ï¿½rnek verebiliriz. Tï¿½r iï¿½inde meydana gelen sï¿½nï¿½rlï¿½ ve belirli deï¿½iï¿½iklikler gen havuzunda oluï¿½ur. Zaten bu da o canlï¿½nï¿½n genetik bilgisinde kayï¿½tlï¿½dï¿½r. Bu deï¿½iï¿½iklikler gen havuzunun dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½na asla ï¿½ï¿½kamaz. Elimize bir deste iskambil kaï¿½ï¿½dï¿½ aldï¿½ï¿½ï¿½mï¿½zï¿½ dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nelim; bu desteyi ne kadar karï¿½ï¿½tï¿½rï¿½rsak karï¿½ï¿½tï¿½ralï¿½m ortaya farklï¿½ bir kaï¿½ï¿½t tï¿½rï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½kmaz. Yalnï¿½zca kaï¿½ï¿½tlarï¿½n sï¿½rasï¿½ ve dizilimi deï¿½iï¿½ir. Bu deï¿½iï¿½iklik de ancak belli sayï¿½da olur. ï¿½ï¿½te genetik ï¿½eï¿½itlilik de (varyasyon) aynen bï¿½yledir. (Harun Yahya, Tï¿½rlerin Evrimi Yanï¿½lgï¿½sï¿½)

Ayrï¿½ca bugï¿½ne kadar evrimsel mekanizmalarla elde edilmiï¿½ hiï¿½bir gï¿½zlenebilir tï¿½rleï¿½me ï¿½rneï¿½i de yoktur.

Bir evrimci olan, Wired dergisi Editï¿½rï¿½ ve All Species Vakfï¿½ Baï¿½kanï¿½ Kevin Kelly bunu ï¿½ï¿½yle itiraf etmektedir: "Yoï¿½un bir gï¿½zleme raï¿½men, kayï¿½tlï¿½ tarihte, doï¿½ada hiï¿½bir yeni tï¿½rï¿½n ortaya ï¿½ï¿½ktï¿½ï¿½ï¿½na tanï¿½k olmadï¿½k. Ayrï¿½ca, iï¿½in en ilginci, hayvan yetiï¿½tiriciliï¿½inde hiï¿½bir yeni hayvan tï¿½rï¿½nï¿½n ortaya ï¿½ï¿½ktï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½ da gï¿½rmedik. Tï¿½rleï¿½meyi saï¿½lamak iï¿½in sinek popï¿½lasyonlarï¿½na kï¿½ï¿½ï¿½k ve bï¿½yï¿½k baskï¿½larï¿½n kasten uygulandï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ meyve sineï¿½i araï¿½tï¿½rmalarï¿½nda, yï¿½z milyonlarca nesilde hiï¿½bir yeni meyve sineï¿½i tï¿½rï¿½nï¿½n oluï¿½mamasï¿½ da buna dahildir... Doï¿½ada, yetiï¿½tiricilikte ve yapay hayatta, varyasyonun ortaya ï¿½ï¿½kï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½ gï¿½rï¿½rï¿½z. Ancak bï¿½yï¿½k deï¿½iï¿½imin yokluï¿½u ile birlikte, varyasyon limitlerinin dar bir alanda ve ï¿½oï¿½u kez tï¿½rï¿½n kendi iï¿½inde sï¿½nï¿½rlanmï¿½ï¿½ olarak gï¿½rï¿½ndï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½ de aï¿½ï¿½kï¿½a fark ederiz." (Kevin Kelly, Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Fourth Estate, 1995, s. 475.)

Tï¿½rleï¿½meyi kanï¿½tlamak iï¿½in, yaklaï¿½ï¿½k yetmiï¿½ yï¿½ldï¿½r meyve sinekleri yetiï¿½tirilmiï¿½, bunlar sï¿½rekli olarak mutasyona uï¿½ratï¿½lmï¿½ï¿½; ancak hiï¿½bir evrimsel deï¿½iï¿½im yaï¿½anmamï¿½ï¿½, hiï¿½bir tï¿½rleï¿½me vakasï¿½na rastlanmamï¿½ï¿½, meyve sineï¿½i yine meyve sineï¿½i olarak kalmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. (Gordon R. Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, Harper & Row, New York, 1983, s. 48)

Kaldï¿½ ki evrimcilerin sï¿½kï¿½ntï¿½sï¿½ bunlarla da sï¿½nï¿½rlï¿½ deï¿½ildir. Zira fosil kayï¿½tlarï¿½ tï¿½rleï¿½me kavramï¿½nï¿½ kesinlikle reddetmektedir. Fosil kayï¿½tlarï¿½nda, Darwinizm'e gï¿½re yaï¿½amï¿½ï¿½ olmasï¿½ gereken sayï¿½sï¿½z "ara tï¿½r"e ait hiï¿½bir belirti yoktur. Bu fosillerin ileride bulunabileceï¿½ini dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nen Darwin'in gï¿½rï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½n yanlï¿½ï¿½ olduï¿½u kesinlikle anlaï¿½ï¿½lmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. Evrimciler gï¿½nï¿½mï¿½zde "tï¿½rleï¿½me fosil kayï¿½tlarï¿½nda gï¿½rï¿½lemeyecek kadar hï¿½zlï¿½dï¿½r" ï¿½eklinde bir bahane ileri sï¿½rmekte; daha doï¿½rusu bï¿½yle bir avuntunun arkasï¿½na saklanmaktadï¿½rlar.

ï¿½ngiliz biyologlar Paul Pearson ve Katherine Harcourt-Brown, tï¿½rleï¿½menin fosil kayï¿½tlarï¿½nda gï¿½rï¿½lmediï¿½ini ï¿½stï¿½ kapalï¿½ olarak ï¿½ï¿½yle ifade ederler:"Tï¿½rleï¿½meyi, biyolojik anlamda, fosil kayï¿½tlarï¿½nda teï¿½his etmek oldukï¿½a gï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r...." (Paul N. Pearson, Katherine G. Harcourt-Brown, ï¿½Speciation and the Fossil Recordï¿½, Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 2001, ï¿½.els.net.)

Kï¿½sacasï¿½, tï¿½rlerin kï¿½keni, tï¿½r oluï¿½umu ve hayatï¿½n ï¿½eï¿½itliliï¿½i gibi konular, evrim teorisinin iddia ettiï¿½i gibi doï¿½al sï¿½reï¿½ler ve rastlantï¿½sal etkilerle aï¿½ï¿½klanamaz. Dahasï¿½, bilimsel bulgular Darwinizm'in bilim dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ ve akï¿½l dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ bir teori olduï¿½unu kanï¿½tlamaktadï¿½r. Gï¿½nï¿½mï¿½zde pek ï¿½ok bilim adamï¿½ bunun bilincindedir.

Sonuï¿½ olarak, tï¿½rlerin kï¿½keni ve ï¿½eï¿½itliliï¿½i evrimciler iï¿½in hala cevapsï¿½zdï¿½r. Evrimciler eï¿½er bunun cevabï¿½nï¿½ bulmak istiyorlarsa, Darwinist aldatmaca ve safsatalara inanmaktan vazgeï¿½mek ve ï¿½u gerï¿½eï¿½i kabul etmek zorundadï¿½rlar: Her canlï¿½ tipini zengin bir varyasyon potansiyeli ile yaratan, sonsuz gï¿½ï¿½, bilgi ve akï¿½l sahibi olan Allah'tï¿½r.

Yaratmak yalnï¿½zca Allah'a mahsustur. Bu gerï¿½eï¿½i inkar edenlerin, ne kadar uï¿½raï¿½ï¿½rlarsa uï¿½raï¿½sï¿½nlar, elde edecekleri sadece hï¿½sran olacaktï¿½r.

ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k, hemen hemen her
toplum ve ideolojiden kiï¿½inin hemfikir olduï¿½u ve savunduï¿½u bir kavramdï¿½r.
ï¿½nsanlï¿½k tarihindeki ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½malarï¿½n, savaï¿½larï¿½n ï¿½oï¿½undaki amaï¿½, ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½
kazanmak olmuï¿½tur.
Batï¿½ dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ncesinin ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½ï¿½e verdiï¿½i anlamï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½yle ï¿½zetleyebiliriz:
ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k, insana, diï¿½er insanlar (toplum) ya da devlet -veya baï¿½ka
herhangi bir kurum- tarafï¿½ndan hiï¿½bir kï¿½sï¿½tlama ve baskï¿½ yapï¿½lmamasï¿½dï¿½r.Bugï¿½n
Batï¿½ toplumlarï¿½nï¿½n iï¿½inde bulunduklarï¿½ toplumsal yapï¿½, modern Batï¿½
felsefesi tarafï¿½ndan tarifi yapï¿½lan "ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k" kavramï¿½nï¿½n,
insanï¿½n kurtuluï¿½unu saï¿½lamadï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½ gï¿½stermektedir.

Okullarda, bilimsel kaynaklarda ve bir kï¿½sï¿½m medyada, teori ispatlanmï¿½ï¿½
bir gerï¿½ek gibi sunulmakta, pek ï¿½ok insan da bu nedenle evrimi hiï¿½
sorgulamadan kabul etmektedir. Oysa her geï¿½en gï¿½n geliï¿½en, paleoantropoloji,
antropoloji ve mikrobiyoloji gibi bilim dallarï¿½, sï¿½zï¿½nï¿½ ettiï¿½imiz
yaygï¿½n inanï¿½ï¿½ï¿½n aksine, evrim teorisini sï¿½rekli yalanlamaktadï¿½rlar.
Evrimi ispatlamak iï¿½in 150 yï¿½ldï¿½r aralï¿½ksï¿½z sï¿½rdï¿½rï¿½len ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½malar,
teoriyi ï¿½ï¿½rï¿½tmekten baï¿½ka bir sonuca varamamï¿½ï¿½lardï¿½r.
Bu gerï¿½eï¿½e raï¿½men, evrim teorisinin bu denli yaygï¿½n bir biï¿½imde
savunulmasï¿½ ve insanlara empoze edilmesinin tek nedeni ise, teorinin
ideolojik yï¿½nï¿½dï¿½r.