20. yï¿½zyï¿½lï¿½n son dï¿½neminde dï¿½nyanï¿½n geleceï¿½i ile ilgili tahminler arasï¿½ndan bir tanesi sivrilip ï¿½ne ï¿½ï¿½kï¿½yordu. Batï¿½ medyasï¿½ bu fikre dï¿½rt elle sarï¿½lï¿½yor, dï¿½nya bï¿½yï¿½k bir ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½manï¿½n eï¿½iï¿½indeymiï¿½ gibi gï¿½sterilmeye ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½ï¿½lï¿½yordu. "Medeniyetler ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½masï¿½" adï¿½ verilen materyalist dï¿½nya gï¿½rï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½n bir yansï¿½masï¿½ olan bu teori 21. yï¿½zyï¿½lda artï¿½k ï¿½lkelerin ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½masï¿½ dï¿½neminin ortadan kalkacaï¿½ï¿½ ve yerini, medeniyetlerin ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½masï¿½na bï¿½rakacaï¿½ï¿½ iddiasï¿½nï¿½ ortaya atmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½. Bu ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½manï¿½n da ï¿½ncelikle iki bï¿½yï¿½k medeniyet olan ï¿½slam ve Hï¿½ristiyan medeniyetleri arasï¿½nda olacaï¿½ï¿½ iddia ediliyordu. ï¿½slam'ï¿½n ve Hï¿½ristiyanlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½n gerï¿½ek ï¿½zï¿½nï¿½ bilmemekten ya da gï¿½zardï¿½ etmekten kaynaklanan bu iddianï¿½n gecersizliï¿½i 21. yï¿½zyï¿½lï¿½n baï¿½lamasï¿½yla ortaya ï¿½ï¿½ktï¿½. ï¿½ddialarï¿½n aksine son yï¿½llarda ï¿½lahi dinler arasï¿½nda, birbirini anlama ve sempatiye dayalï¿½ sï¿½cak bir yakï¿½nlaï¿½ma yaï¿½anmaya baï¿½lanmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. Tanï¿½tï¿½mï¿½nï¿½ yaptï¿½ï¿½ï¿½mï¿½z www.kitapehli.com sitesi bu konuyu kendisine amaï¿½ edinmiï¿½ bir site. Sitede, her ï¿½ï¿½ dinin mensuplarï¿½nï¿½n, birlikte, yeryï¿½zï¿½ndeki ortak dï¿½ï¿½manlarï¿½ olan materyalist ve Darwinist fikir akï¿½mlarï¿½yla, kï¿½ltï¿½rel bir mï¿½cadele etmesi gerektiï¿½i savunuluyor. Aï¿½aï¿½ï¿½daki alï¿½ntï¿½ ise sitede anlatï¿½lan ï¿½slamiyetin ve Hï¿½ristiyanlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½n sahip olduï¿½u ortak deï¿½erleri ortaya koyuyor.
“Allah ï¿½eï¿½itli dï¿½nemlerde elï¿½iler gï¿½ndererek, kitaplar indirerek insanlara yol gï¿½stermiï¿½tir. Bï¿½ylece ilk insan olan Hz. Adem'den itibaren insanlar, Allah'ï¿½n varlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ndan ve emirlerinden haberdar edilmiï¿½ler; ihtiyaï¿½ duyacaklarï¿½ her tï¿½rlï¿½ konunun en doï¿½ru ve hikmetli aï¿½ï¿½klamasï¿½nï¿½ hak dinlerde bulmuï¿½lardï¿½r. Hak dinler, gï¿½nderildikleri dï¿½nemlerin ortam ve ï¿½artlarï¿½na gï¿½re farklï¿½ hï¿½kï¿½mler iï¿½ermiï¿½ olsalar da, temelde aynï¿½ inanï¿½ ve ahlaki modeli insanlara sunmuï¿½lardï¿½r. Hepsi, Allah'ï¿½n varlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½, birliï¿½i, sï¿½fatlarï¿½, insanï¿½n ve tï¿½m varlï¿½klarï¿½n yaratï¿½lï¿½ï¿½ amaï¿½larï¿½, Allah'a nasï¿½l kul olmak gerektiï¿½i, Allah'ï¿½n beï¿½endiï¿½i ideal tavï¿½r, davranï¿½ï¿½ ve yaï¿½am biï¿½iminin nasï¿½l olmasï¿½ gerektiï¿½i, iyi, kï¿½tï¿½, doï¿½ru, yanlï¿½ï¿½ kavramlarï¿½nï¿½n neler olduklarï¿½, insanï¿½n dï¿½nyadaki yaï¿½amï¿½nï¿½ nasï¿½l dï¿½zenlemesi, sonsuz yaï¿½amï¿½ iï¿½in neler yapmasï¿½ gerektiï¿½i ve bu gibi konularda aynï¿½ temel gerï¿½ekleri insanlara aktarmï¿½ï¿½lardï¿½r.”

ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k, hemen hemen her
toplum ve ideolojiden kiï¿½inin hemfikir olduï¿½u ve savunduï¿½u bir kavramdï¿½r.
ï¿½nsanlï¿½k tarihindeki ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½malarï¿½n, savaï¿½larï¿½n ï¿½oï¿½undaki amaï¿½, ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½
kazanmak olmuï¿½tur.
Batï¿½ dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ncesinin ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½ï¿½e verdiï¿½i anlamï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½yle ï¿½zetleyebiliriz:
ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k, insana, diï¿½er insanlar (toplum) ya da devlet -veya baï¿½ka
herhangi bir kurum- tarafï¿½ndan hiï¿½bir kï¿½sï¿½tlama ve baskï¿½ yapï¿½lmamasï¿½dï¿½r.Bugï¿½n
Batï¿½ toplumlarï¿½nï¿½n iï¿½inde bulunduklarï¿½ toplumsal yapï¿½, modern Batï¿½
felsefesi tarafï¿½ndan tarifi yapï¿½lan "ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k" kavramï¿½nï¿½n,
insanï¿½n kurtuluï¿½unu saï¿½lamadï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½ gï¿½stermektedir.

Okullarda, bilimsel kaynaklarda ve bir kï¿½sï¿½m medyada, teori ispatlanmï¿½ï¿½
bir gerï¿½ek gibi sunulmakta, pek ï¿½ok insan da bu nedenle evrimi hiï¿½
sorgulamadan kabul etmektedir. Oysa her geï¿½en gï¿½n geliï¿½en, paleoantropoloji,
antropoloji ve mikrobiyoloji gibi bilim dallarï¿½, sï¿½zï¿½nï¿½ ettiï¿½imiz
yaygï¿½n inanï¿½ï¿½ï¿½n aksine, evrim teorisini sï¿½rekli yalanlamaktadï¿½rlar.
Evrimi ispatlamak iï¿½in 150 yï¿½ldï¿½r aralï¿½ksï¿½z sï¿½rdï¿½rï¿½len ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½malar,
teoriyi ï¿½ï¿½rï¿½tmekten baï¿½ka bir sonuca varamamï¿½ï¿½lardï¿½r.
Bu gerï¿½eï¿½e raï¿½men, evrim teorisinin bu denli yaygï¿½n bir biï¿½imde
savunulmasï¿½ ve insanlara empoze edilmesinin tek nedeni ise, teorinin
ideolojik yï¿½nï¿½dï¿½r.