Tarihï¿½ilerin hesaplamalarï¿½na gï¿½re, komï¿½nizm nedeniyle 20. yï¿½zyï¿½l boyunca 120 milyona yakï¿½n insan ï¿½ldï¿½rï¿½lmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. Bunlar, bir savaï¿½ sï¿½rasï¿½nda cephede ï¿½len askerler deï¿½il, komï¿½nist devletlerin kendi halklarï¿½nï¿½n iï¿½inden ï¿½ldï¿½rdï¿½kleri sivillerdir.

Komï¿½nizm, Avrupa'da doï¿½muï¿½ ve geï¿½tiï¿½imiz 20. yï¿½zyï¿½la baskï¿½, zulï¿½m ve acï¿½ damgasï¿½nï¿½ vurmuï¿½tur. 120 milyona yakï¿½n erkek, kadï¿½n, yaï¿½lï¿½, kï¿½ï¿½ï¿½k ï¿½ocuk, bebek, sadece "komï¿½nizm" denen bu soï¿½uk, katï¿½, sert ve vahï¿½i ideoloji nedeniyle yaï¿½amï¿½nï¿½ yitirmiï¿½tir.

Komï¿½nizm ilk devrimini daha doï¿½uda, Rusya'da gerï¿½ekleï¿½tirmiï¿½tir. 20. yï¿½zyï¿½lï¿½n ikinci yarï¿½sï¿½nda ise, daha da doï¿½uya doï¿½ru ilerlemiï¿½tir. Nitekim 1949 yï¿½lï¿½nda dï¿½nyanï¿½n en kalabalï¿½k ï¿½lkesi olan ï¿½in, Mao Tse-tung'un ï¿½nderliï¿½indeki komï¿½nist gerillalar tarafï¿½ndan ele geï¿½irilmiï¿½tir. Bu ikinci bï¿½yï¿½k devrimin sonuï¿½larï¿½ ise aynï¿½ birincisi, yani Bolï¿½evik devrimi gibi olmuï¿½tur: Cinayetler, kitle katliamlarï¿½, iï¿½kenceler, kï¿½tlï¿½klar, yoksullaï¿½ma, yozlaï¿½ma ve kendi iï¿½ine kapalï¿½, donuk bir korku toplumu...

1917'deki Bolï¿½evik Devrimi'nden sonra, dï¿½nya ikinci kez bir komï¿½nist devrime ï¿½ahit oluyordu. Bu ikinci devrimin de sonuï¿½larï¿½, en az birincisi kadar kanlï¿½ oldu.

"Bï¿½yï¿½k Atï¿½lï¿½m" ve Bï¿½yï¿½k Kï¿½tlï¿½k

Mao iktidara geldikten sonra herï¿½ey ï¿½ok deï¿½iï¿½ti. Devrimden sonraki ilk yï¿½llarda Mao tï¿½m ï¿½in'e hakim olmak ve komï¿½nist otoriteyi her bï¿½lgede kurmakla uï¿½raï¿½tï¿½. Bu arada binlerce kiï¿½i "sï¿½nï¿½f dï¿½ï¿½manï¿½" olmak suï¿½uyla tutuklandï¿½ ve halka aï¿½ï¿½k idam gï¿½sterileriyle asï¿½ldï¿½. Mao, 1950'lerin ortalarï¿½nda ise Stalin'in Sovyetler Birliï¿½i'nde uyguladï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ kollektivizasyona benzer bir giriï¿½im tasarlamaya baï¿½ladï¿½. Mao, projesine "Bï¿½yï¿½k Atï¿½lï¿½m" adï¿½nï¿½ vermiï¿½ti. Ama proje ï¿½in halkï¿½na sadece bï¿½yï¿½k bir kï¿½tlï¿½k ve iï¿½kence getirdi.

Bï¿½yï¿½k Atï¿½lï¿½m hareketi, Stalin'in Ukrayna'daki yapay kï¿½tlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ gibi, insan yapï¿½mï¿½ bir kï¿½tlï¿½ktï¿½. Komï¿½nizmin Kara Kitabï¿½'nda Bï¿½yï¿½k Atï¿½lï¿½m dï¿½nemi ï¿½in manzaralarï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½yle anlatï¿½lï¿½yor: "Aï¿½lï¿½ï¿½ï¿½n siyasi kaynaklï¿½ oluï¿½u, yï¿½ksek ï¿½lï¿½m oranlarï¿½nï¿½n kï¿½ktenci Maocular tarafï¿½ndan yï¿½netilen taï¿½ra bï¿½lgelerinde yoï¿½unlaï¿½masï¿½yla kanï¿½tlanmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r, oysa buralarï¿½ olaï¿½an zamanlarda tahï¿½l ihracatï¿½ï¿½sï¿½ bï¿½lgelerdi... Henan'daki eylemciler, tï¿½pkï¿½ Mao gibi, tï¿½m zorluklarï¿½n kï¿½ylï¿½lerin tahï¿½lï¿½ saklamasï¿½ndan kaynaklandï¿½ï¿½ï¿½na inanmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½: ï¿½lkenin ilk halk komï¿½nï¿½nï¿½n kurulduï¿½u Xinyang'ï¿½n (10 milyon nï¿½fuslu) vilayet sekreterine gï¿½re "Sebep gï¿½da eksikliï¿½i deï¿½ildi. Bol miktarda tahï¿½l vardï¿½, ama burada yaï¿½ayanlarï¿½n yï¿½zde 90'ï¿½nda ideolojik sorunlar bulunuyordu. Kï¿½ylï¿½lerin tï¿½mï¿½ne karï¿½ï¿½ 1959 Sonbaharï¿½'nda ï¿½iddetli bir askeri saldï¿½rï¿½ baï¿½latï¿½ldï¿½; bunun sorumlularï¿½, Japon karï¿½ï¿½tï¿½ gerilla hareketinin yï¿½ntemlerini kullanï¿½yordu. 10.000'den fazla kï¿½ylï¿½ hapsedildi; bunlarï¿½n birï¿½oï¿½u o sï¿½rada aï¿½lï¿½ktan ï¿½lecekti. Bï¿½tï¿½n ï¿½zel ï¿½ahï¿½s mutfaklarï¿½ndaki araï¿½ gereï¿½lerin (kullanï¿½lmï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½elik haline dï¿½nï¿½ï¿½tï¿½rï¿½lmemiï¿½lerin), tï¿½m ï¿½z tï¿½ketimi ve kooperatif ï¿½rï¿½nlerini yï¿½rï¿½tme arzusunu yasaklayacak biï¿½imde, parï¿½alanmasï¿½ iï¿½in emir verildi. Sert kï¿½ï¿½ yaklaï¿½ï¿½rken, her tï¿½rlï¿½ ateï¿½ yakma da yasaklandï¿½! Baskï¿½ eylemleri dehï¿½et vericiydi: Binlerce tutukluya sistemli iï¿½kenceler yapï¿½lï¿½yordu. Oysa bu sï¿½rada, ulusal bir kampanya "Henan'dan ders alï¿½nmasï¿½" iï¿½in propaganda yapï¿½yordu. "Kï¿½zï¿½l bayraï¿½ï¿½n ï¿½lï¿½m oranï¿½ yï¿½zde 99 olsa bile gï¿½nderde tutulacaï¿½ï¿½nï¿½n" ilan edildiï¿½i Anhui'deki kadrolar, canlï¿½ canlï¿½ topraï¿½a gï¿½mme ve kï¿½zgï¿½n demirle iï¿½kence gibi eski iyi geleneklere dï¿½ndï¿½ler."

Kamboï¿½ya'da Komï¿½nizm Vahï¿½eti

Zaten acï¿½masï¿½z, ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½macï¿½, zalim ve kan dï¿½kï¿½cï¿½ bir ideoloji olan komï¿½nizm, Maoculukla birlikte daha da ileri bir vahï¿½et boyutuna varmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r.

Bu olguyu daha da iyi anlayabilmek iï¿½in, Asya'daki bir baï¿½ka komï¿½nizm ï¿½rneï¿½ine daha bakmak gerekir. Sï¿½z konusu ï¿½rnek, ï¿½in'in desteï¿½iyle iktidara gelmiï¿½ ve Maoculuï¿½u yï¿½ntem olarak benimsemiï¿½ bir rejimdir: Kamboï¿½ya'daki Kï¿½zï¿½l Khmer rejimi.

Kï¿½zï¿½l Khmer ï¿½rgï¿½tï¿½, Pol Pot adlï¿½ bir Maocu tarafï¿½ndan kurulmuï¿½ ve yï¿½netilmiï¿½ bir komï¿½nist partidir. Uzun yï¿½llar Kamboï¿½ya ormanlarï¿½nda ï¿½rgï¿½tlenen ve iktidar hayalleri kuran Kï¿½zï¿½l Khmerler, 1975'te bu rï¿½yalarï¿½na kavuï¿½urlar. ï¿½ktidara geldikten sonra da, Stalin Rusyasï¿½'nda veya Mao'nun ï¿½ini'nde bile gï¿½rï¿½lmeyen boyutlarda totaliter ve zalim bir rejim kurarlar. Kï¿½zï¿½l Khmer rejimi, komï¿½nist cinnetin doruk noktasï¿½dï¿½r. Parti, ï¿½lke iï¿½in yapï¿½lmasï¿½ gereken tek komï¿½nist gï¿½revin, pirinï¿½ tarlalarï¿½nda ï¿½lesiye ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½mak olduï¿½una karar vermiï¿½ ve tï¿½m Kamboï¿½ya nï¿½fusunu tarlalarda ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½tï¿½rmaya baï¿½lamï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. ï¿½ehirlerde yaï¿½ayan on binlerce insan -devlet adamlarï¿½, bï¿½rokratlar, ï¿½ï¿½retmenler, aydï¿½nlar- kï¿½ylere sï¿½rï¿½lmï¿½ï¿½ ve oluï¿½turulan kollektif ï¿½iftliklerde ï¿½ok aï¿½ï¿½r ï¿½artlarda ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½tï¿½rï¿½lmaya baï¿½latï¿½lmï¿½ï¿½lardï¿½r. ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½ma sï¿½rasï¿½nda dinlenmek, toplanan ï¿½rï¿½nlerden bir parï¿½a bile olsun izinsiz olarak yemek veya herhangi bir dini ibadette bulunmak "devrime isyan" sayï¿½lmï¿½ï¿½ ve bu gibi asï¿½lsï¿½z bahanelerle insanlar ï¿½ldï¿½rï¿½lmeye baï¿½lanmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r.

Kuzey Kore ve Vietnam

Asya'daki kï¿½zï¿½l vahï¿½et sadece ï¿½in ve Kamboï¿½ya ile de sï¿½nï¿½rlï¿½ kalmamï¿½ï¿½, Kuzey Kore ve Vietnam'daki komï¿½nist rejimler de kendi halklarï¿½na karï¿½ï¿½ acï¿½masï¿½z bir terï¿½r uygulamï¿½ï¿½lardï¿½r. On yï¿½llarca Kim Li Sung'un diktasï¿½ altï¿½nda yï¿½netilen Kuzey Kore rejiminin katlettiï¿½i insan sayï¿½sï¿½nï¿½n 1.5 milyon olduï¿½u hesaplanmaktadï¿½r. Yï¿½z binlerce insan ise Kuzey Kore'nin hapishanelerinde iï¿½kence gï¿½rmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r. Komï¿½nizmin Kara Kitabï¿½'nda, insanlarï¿½n hayvan muamelesi gï¿½rdï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ Kuzey Kore hapishanelerinden ï¿½ï¿½yle sï¿½z edilir:

"... Terim resmen kullanï¿½lmasa da sï¿½z konusu olan gerï¿½ek cezaeviydi. 2000'i kadï¿½n 6000 insan bu ceza kompleksinde, sabahï¿½n 05.30'undan gece yarï¿½sï¿½na kadar terlik, tabanca kï¿½lï¿½fï¿½, ï¿½anta, kemer, patlayï¿½cï¿½ ateï¿½leyicileri, yapay ï¿½iï¿½ekler ï¿½retmek ï¿½zere hayvanlar gibi ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½ï¿½yordu. Hamile mahkumlar korkunï¿½ bir biï¿½imde ï¿½ocuk dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½rmeye zorlanï¿½yordu. Cezaevinde doï¿½an her ï¿½ocuk kaï¿½ï¿½nï¿½lmaz olarak boï¿½uluyor ya da boï¿½azlanï¿½yordu." (Harun Yahya, Komï¿½nizm Pusuda)

Darwinizm'i temel alan, dolayï¿½sï¿½yla insanï¿½ ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½arak kan dï¿½kmeye mahkum bir hayvan tï¿½rï¿½ olarak gï¿½ren komï¿½nizm, Uzak Doï¿½u Asya'nï¿½n pirinï¿½ tarlalarï¿½nï¿½ birer ï¿½lï¿½m tarlasï¿½ haline getirmiï¿½tir. Dahasï¿½, Uzak Doï¿½u Asya'da komï¿½nizmin medeniyet ve kï¿½ltï¿½r dï¿½ï¿½manlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ daha ileri boyutlara varmï¿½ï¿½, cehaleti, ï¿½irkinliï¿½i, tekdï¿½zeliï¿½i ve dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nmemeyi makbul gï¿½ren, medeniyet yerine hayvanca yaï¿½amayï¿½ tercih eden korkunï¿½ bir ideoloji ortaya ï¿½ï¿½kmï¿½ï¿½tï¿½r.

ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k, hemen hemen her
toplum ve ideolojiden kiï¿½inin hemfikir olduï¿½u ve savunduï¿½u bir kavramdï¿½r.
ï¿½nsanlï¿½k tarihindeki ï¿½atï¿½ï¿½malarï¿½n, savaï¿½larï¿½n ï¿½oï¿½undaki amaï¿½, ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½ï¿½ï¿½
kazanmak olmuï¿½tur.
Batï¿½ dï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ncesinin ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½ï¿½e verdiï¿½i anlamï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½yle ï¿½zetleyebiliriz:
ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k, insana, diï¿½er insanlar (toplum) ya da devlet -veya baï¿½ka
herhangi bir kurum- tarafï¿½ndan hiï¿½bir kï¿½sï¿½tlama ve baskï¿½ yapï¿½lmamasï¿½dï¿½r.Bugï¿½n
Batï¿½ toplumlarï¿½nï¿½n iï¿½inde bulunduklarï¿½ toplumsal yapï¿½, modern Batï¿½
felsefesi tarafï¿½ndan tarifi yapï¿½lan "ï¿½zgï¿½rlï¿½k" kavramï¿½nï¿½n,
insanï¿½n kurtuluï¿½unu saï¿½lamadï¿½ï¿½ï¿½nï¿½ gï¿½stermektedir.

Okullarda, bilimsel kaynaklarda ve bir kï¿½sï¿½m medyada, teori ispatlanmï¿½ï¿½
bir gerï¿½ek gibi sunulmakta, pek ï¿½ok insan da bu nedenle evrimi hiï¿½
sorgulamadan kabul etmektedir. Oysa her geï¿½en gï¿½n geliï¿½en, paleoantropoloji,
antropoloji ve mikrobiyoloji gibi bilim dallarï¿½, sï¿½zï¿½nï¿½ ettiï¿½imiz
yaygï¿½n inanï¿½ï¿½ï¿½n aksine, evrim teorisini sï¿½rekli yalanlamaktadï¿½rlar.
Evrimi ispatlamak iï¿½in 150 yï¿½ldï¿½r aralï¿½ksï¿½z sï¿½rdï¿½rï¿½len ï¿½alï¿½ï¿½malar,
teoriyi ï¿½ï¿½rï¿½tmekten baï¿½ka bir sonuca varamamï¿½ï¿½lardï¿½r.
Bu gerï¿½eï¿½e raï¿½men, evrim teorisinin bu denli yaygï¿½n bir biï¿½imde
savunulmasï¿½ ve insanlara empoze edilmesinin tek nedeni ise, teorinin
ideolojik yï¿½nï¿½dï¿½r.